Wonderful Latin Names: Allobates niputidea

I have a new favourite frog.

I’m late to this, as it was described and named 13 years ago (and makes regular rounds on Twitter), but I’m rather enamoured with the western Colombian frog Allobates niputidea. Not because of its looks: it’s a small brown frog with a stripe, looking almost exactly like its sister species A. talamancae and, less specifically, rather a lot like dozens upon dozens of small brownish frogs everywhere. But its name: chef’s kiss.

Taran Grant, André Acosta, and Marco Rada named A. niputidea. It’s not a descriptive name, or a geographic one, or an eponymous one (although I do love me a good eponymous name). Instead, they explain in a deadpan sort of way, “the specific epithet is…

the name commonly applied by Colombian herpetologists to this and other small, brown frogs of unknown identity”. If you speak some rather, um, “colloquial” Spanish, you’ll know that ni puta idea means “no idea”.  Well, no. It’s best translated as “no f**king idea”.

I giggled, because I’m 12 years old inside.   I suppose there will be some very serious minded naturalists out there who think this is a terrible name, trivializing biodiversity or the work of taxonomists or the knowledge of local herpetologists.*  But it seems to me if any trivializing is being done, it’s being done by those who interpret the name that way, not by the naming itself; and some innocent (well, not quite innocent) amusement is a welcome thing in science. Or it should be.

It’s not just my inner 12-year-old, though. A. niputidea can remind us of something important. Earth has some spectacularly striking and beautiful species: birds of paradise, poison-arrow frogs, glass-wing butterflies. But it also has a whole heck of a lot of less charismatic species, and a lot of species that are very hard to tell apart. Birders talk wryly about LBJs (“little brown jobs”). There’s the spectacular panther chameleon, but there are also hundreds of small greenish or brownish lizards, some of them distinguished by scale counts and not a lot more. And I’m an entomologist, and I know that there are probably 5,000 species of blackish ground beetles in the world, all looking rather similar and distinctly unprepossessing (except, of course, to another of their kin).  These less charismatic species struggle for conservation attention, but they’re just as important in their ecosystems as their flamboyant sisters. Not only that: their similarity, in morphology or ecology or both, raises interesting and important questions about the way the Earth’s biodiversity originates and is regulated.** If Allobates niputidea can speak up, in its etymologically amusing way, for the biodiversity that doesn’t make the cover of National Geographic, that seems like a real contribution.

Some day, I’ll go to Colombia, and find a little brown frog. When someone asks me what it is I’ll be able to say (after checking the immediate vicinity for impressionable 5-year-olds) “it’s Allobates niputidea”.  I can assure you, I am going to enjoy that very, very much.

© Stephen Heard  January 26, 2021

Hat tip on this one to Jaime Erdmann and Isabelle Côté, thanks to whom I know about this wonderful Latin name.

Image: Allobates niputidea © Jorge Díaz Pérez, used by permission


*^Although since the authors are local herpetologists, that particular objection would seem misguided. Surely they get to poke fun at themselves? Surely we all do?

**^About which we have considerably more than ni puta idea, but considerably less than the understanding we’d like to have.

3 thoughts on “Wonderful Latin Names: Allobates niputidea

  1. Elizabeth Moon

    Among Texas botanists and wildflower enthusiasts there’s the ADYF: another damned yellow flower. We have a plethora of yellow flowers we used to call Compositae and now call Asteraceae, and a startling number are the same shade of yellow, the same height, and found side by side–though we also have them in other families and in various heights. The very early lavender and white group (with a few blues) is followed shortly by more blue, more purple, and then…the yellow starts. A bright school-bus, SLOW sign, golden yellow–not mellow gold but brash and bright.

    I have a huge old copy of Correll & Johnston’s _Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas_, the text for a native plants course I took back in the early ’70s, when we had to struggle our way through its tiny print and unforgiving vocabulary to ID everything spotted on the frequent field trips at “peak bloom” in central Texas. The ADYFs were the pits.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. ScientistSeesSquirrel Post author

      Ah, yes – we used “DYC” (“damned yellow composite”) for those. Heterotheca, Pityopsis, Grindelia, Haplopappus, and that’s just off the top of my head! I did some botanical collecting in the southwest US, back when I was an undergrad, and so I have some modest familiarity with “your” DYCs as well as our own here. (You have more!!)

      Like

      Reply
  2. Pingback: Barf-and-buff writing, and cherry-picking citations | Scientist Sees Squirrel

Comment on this post:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.