My goodness that’s a lot of squirrels

This is my 500th post on Scientist Sees Squirrel*, and my goodness, that’s quite the logorrheic accomplishment.

When I started this blog, back in January of 2015, I really didn’t know where it was going. (Like many of my major life decisions, starting a blog wasn’t thoroughly thought out.) It’s astonishing to me that I’m still at it, nearly 7 years later; and that I’ve written 500 posts and thus, roughly, 550,000 words. That’s just a little bit less verbiage than War and Peace, and a little more than Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (the doorstopperiest of the series) and Moby Dick (which, by the way, carries an important lesson for scientific writers) combined.

Like Dynamic Ecology, I know I’ll eventually stop spelling ‘banana’; but not yet. Blogs are dying, and readership here has plateaued (there’s even some evidence it’s dropping off, although it’s a little hard to tell). So maybe I’m swimming upstream, but I still seem to have some things to say, and at least some folks still enjoy hearing them. There are more squirrels to come; but right now I think I’ve earned just a little bit of navel gazing. So, amongst those 500 posts, here are a few that stand out to me for various reasons.

  • My most popular post, and I have no idea why, is Friends Don’t Let Friends Use “c.f.”. Five years later, this post still gets read about 40 times a day – and it’s trivial. Well, mostly trivial. It’s a list of common Latin abbreviations, with the observation that “c.f.” is frequently misused and how that’s an example of semantic drift in our language. And this has been read 30,000 times?  The best part of the post, by the way, is the You Can Call Me et. Al parody lyrics, but I can’t even claim credit, as they’re from Alex Bond.
  • Dueling for second place are two posts that I think are actually useful. For The Love Of All That Is Holy, Stop Writing “Utilize” takes a potshot at one of our most egregious writing bad habits – and it’s one that generalizes well. In scientific writing, we sure do like using long fancy words when short plain ones mean the same thing. And Why Do We Make Statistics So Hard For Our Students tackles what I think is a huge bit of pedagogical malpractice: we (university academics, both in biology departments and math/stats ones) tend to teach statistics in ways that make it really awful for students. The post suggests an alternative that I think can help a lot. I use it myself, in our graduate biostats course.
  • Once or twice, a post has gone semi-viral. This seems to involve a post getting picked up by some kind of news aggregator or appearing on a browser’s suggestions screen. I have no idea how or why this happens, and especially no idea why it happened to Court: “Spiders are insects.” Biologists: “Say what?”. My one and only foray into the law (and Alabama law, at that). As you might expect, though, if you understand the particular dimensions of my nerdiness, it involves insects, the history of science, and the evolution of language. At any rate: it was read 16,000 times in a week, and then promptly and thoroughly forgotten.
  • Finally: I once wrote a post that was so weird (even for me) that I don’t think anyone has ever read it all the way through: Vultures for England: A Modest Proposal. It takes a Jonathan Swiftian approach to the biology of species invasions, with detours through the representation of birds in the plays of William Shakespeare and in the western novels of Zane Grey. (I did mention it was weird, even for me).

A lot of folks have been reading Scientist Sees Squirrel for a long time. If you’ve gotten this far through this post, you’re probably one of them. Is there a post that (for better or for worse) stuck with you? Tell me, please, in the Replies. You can help me navel-gaze.

© Stephen Heard  December 7, 2021

Image: 500 © Tom Magliery via flickr.com CC BY-SA-NC 2.0 (Marker for a tree’s 500th growth ring, Lighthouse Park, West Vancouver).


*^To be honest, I’m not exactly sure of the number. WordPress tells me I’ve published somewhat more than 500, but a few have been guest posts and one or two I’ve posted twice (with revisions). As nit-pickingly pedantic as I can be at times, I can’t bring myself to do a careful count.

 

8 thoughts on “My goodness that’s a lot of squirrels

  1. Jess T.

    I think I only recently began reading “Scientist Sees Squirrel” but your prose makes me want to read all of your previous posts! I have also found that my most read blog posts are some of my most random, and certainly not my favorites, but they help people nonetheless. My views have also started to decline this year, and I honestly took it as a personal failure, but now I think I will reconsider that people are just moving towards new forms of media.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  2. Lauri Laanisto (@LauriLaanisto)

    Blogs have been completely and utterly dead for at least a decade or two! Well, at least according to the most insightful news portals. But for me, blog (esp. if it is like this one) is just a bunch of texts. And texts, despite the invention of radio and television etc., are still going strong. And even in the world where 90% of people are illiterate (e.g. Dark Medieval times on Earth), text still play a significant role shaping the lives of the masses. So, I, personally do not see any reason to stop blogging (and I mostly blog in Estonian, which is spoken by just a tiny tribe in a little strip of boreal forest up north…). Keep on going!

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  3. Terry McGlynn

    Congrats on the milestone(ish)! And I’m pleased that you’re sticking with it.

    Over the past several months the blogging muse has rarely asked me out for coffee, but that’s only a reflection of me handling everything else not so well. So when I get my act together, I will probably pick up the habit once again. Because I’ve noticed there’s a positive association with blogging and writing elsewhere, and I’ve got to get back to writing more in general.

    Like

    Reply
  4. Chris Mebane

    Congratulations! And now for a self-serving suggestion, since I like reading the blog and hope you too don’t go into a Dynamic Estivation too soon: Re-post more reruns! Reuse, recycle, and reduce work on yourself. So you & we can stretch it out. Plus, who’s read them all? Besides you, that is. I forget when I found your blog – you were getting the final chapters on The Scientists Guide to Writing out the door. So there have to be lots that were topical when you wrote them and are again, with a couple of sentences and links to current stuff to reintroduce it. Exploit your previous labors to the max! And yes, you can self-plagiarize all you want on your very own blog.

    Like

    Reply

Comment on this post:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.